<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Identity on Wirez</title><link>https://wirez.top/tags/identity/</link><description>Recent content in Identity on Wirez</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><atom:link href="https://wirez.top/tags/identity/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>IPv8 risks: Why centralization creates failure</title><link>https://wirez.top/posts/ipv8-risks-centralized-zone-server-creates-failure/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://wirez.top/posts/ipv8-risks-centralized-zone-server-creates-failure/</guid><description>&lt;meta charset="utf-8">
&lt;!-- wp:paragraph {"className":"std-text"} -->
&lt;!-- /wp:paragraph -->
&lt;!-- wp:paragraph {"className":"std-text"} -->
&lt;p class="std-text">With Google&amp;#039;s &lt;a href="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8200" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">IPv6&lt;/a> access hitting 50.10% in March 2026, the proposed IPv8 protocol fails as a viable Internet standard due to fatal architectural flaws. Joe Klein&amp;#039;s April 2026 critique on NANOG establishes that &lt;strong>IPv8 is not viable&lt;/strong> because it conflates network layers and introduces unacceptable centralization risks. The draft-thain-ipv8-00 submission by One Limited attempts to reinvent routing but ultimately ignores decades of deployed engineering reality.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>