<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Proposals on Wirez</title><link>https://wirez.top/tags/proposals/</link><description>Recent content in Proposals on Wirez</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://wirez.top/tags/proposals/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>APNIC IPv6 /32 vs /36: Why I Back the Larger Block</title><link>https://wirez.top/posts/apnic-ipv6-32-vs-36-why-i-back-the-larger-block/</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://wirez.top/posts/apnic-ipv6-32-vs-36-why-i-back-the-larger-block/</guid><description>&lt;meta charset="utf-8">
&lt;!-- wp:paragraph {"className":"std-text"} -->
&lt;!-- /wp:paragraph -->
&lt;!-- wp:paragraph {"className":"std-text"} -->
&lt;p class="std-text">&lt;a href="https://www.apnic.net/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">APNIC&lt;/a> serves over four billion people, yet debates persist on reducing minimum &lt;strong>IPv6 address&lt;/strong> blocks to a /36. &lt;a href="https://blog.apnic.net/2026/01/20/ip-addresses-through-2025/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">APNIC&amp;#039;s ip addresses through 2025&lt;/a>&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>