<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Valid on Wirez</title><link>https://wirez.top/tags/valid/</link><description>Recent content in Valid on Wirez</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://wirez.top/tags/valid/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Route security gaps: Why East Asia lags at 31%</title><link>https://wirez.top/posts/route-security-gaps-why-east-asia-lags-at-31/</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://wirez.top/posts/route-security-gaps-why-east-asia-lags-at-31/</guid><description>&lt;meta charset="utf-8">
&lt;!-- wp:html -->
&lt;script type="application/ld+json">
{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "FAQPage",
 "mainEntity": [
 {
 "@type": "Question",
 "name": "Why do high ROA signing rates fail to stop route hijacking in some networks?",
 "acceptedAnswer": {
 "@type": "Answer",
 "text": "High signing fails because operators often disable active filtering on their border routers. Regional ROV deployment currently lags at only 13.2% of vantage points, leaving signed prefixes unprotected against invalid route announcements."
 }
 },
 {
 "@type": "Question",
 "name": "Which specific configuration error now causes most invalid routes globally instead of length mistakes?",
 "acceptedAnswer": {
 "@type": "Answer",
 "text": "Autonomous System Number mismatches have replaced maxLength errors as the dominant cause of invalid routes today. This shift signals deeper configuration incompetence regarding origin authority rather than simple prefix length typos."
 }
 },
 {
 "@type": "Question",
 "name": "How much did South East Asia improve its IPv4 valid coverage compared to last year?",
 "acceptedAnswer": {
 "@type": "Answer",
 "text": "South East Asia IPv4 valid coverage surged by approximately 12 percentage points year-on-year to reach 92.4%. This rapid growth contrasts sharply with East Asia, where adoption remains significantly lower due to infrastructure gaps."
 }
 },
 {
 "@type": "Question",
 "name": "What is the current gap between global valid route coverage and actual validation enforcement?",
 "acceptedAnswer": {
 "@type": "Answer",
 "text": "Global valid routes stand at 60.3%, yet actual Route Origin Validation support reaches only 26.6%. This large discrepancy means most networks accept potentially invalid routes despite available cryptographic authorization data."
 }
 },
 {
 "@type": "Question",
 "name": "Why does East Asia show such low IPv4 coverage compared to other sub-regions?",
 "acceptedAnswer": {
 "@type": "Answer",
 "text": "East Asia lags at a dismal 31.0% valid coverage, dragged down by major economies like China and South Korea. This contrasts with South East Asia, which achieved 92.4% coverage through targeted exchange point mandates."
 }
 }
 ]
}
&lt;/script>
&lt;!-- /wp:html -->
&lt;!-- wp:html -->
&lt;style>
.faq-section { margin: 24px 0; padding: 24px 0; border-top: 2px solid #e5e7eb; }
.faq-section-title { color: #1a1a1a; font-size: clamp(1.2rem, 3vw, 1.4rem); font-weight: 700; margin-bottom: 24px; text-align: center; }
.faq-item { background: #fff; border: 1px solid #e5e7eb; border-radius: 8px; margin-bottom: 12px; overflow: hidden; transition: all 0.3s ease; }
.faq-item:hover { border-color: #2563eb; box-shadow: 0 4px 6px rgba(0,0,0,0.05); transform: translateY(-2px); }
.faq-question { background: #f9fafb; padding: 12px 16px; cursor: pointer; position: relative; transition: all 0.3s ease; border: none; width: 100%; text-align: left; font-family: inherit; display: block; }
.faq-question:hover { background: #e8f0fe; }
.faq-question-text { color: #1a1a1a; font-size: 1rem; font-weight: 600; line-height: 1.5; margin: 0; padding-right: 2rem; display: inline-block; }
.faq-answer { max-height: 0; overflow: hidden; transition: max-height 0.4s ease, padding 0.4s ease; padding: 0 16px; }
.faq-item.active .faq-answer { max-height: 1000px; padding: 0 16px 16px; }
.faq-answer-text { color: #4b5563; font-size: 1rem; line-height: 1.7; margin: 12px 0 0; }
&lt;/style>
&lt;script>
(function() {
 function initFAQ() {
 var qs = document.querySelectorAll(".faq-question");
 for (var i = 0; i &lt; qs.length; i++) {
 qs[i].addEventListener("click", function() {
 var item = this.closest(".faq-item");
 var wasActive = item.classList.contains("active");
 var allItems = document.querySelectorAll(".faq-item");
 for (var j = 0; j &lt; allItems.length; j++) { allItems[j].classList.remove("active"); }
 if (!wasActive) item.classList.add("active");
 this.setAttribute("aria-expanded", String(!wasActive));
 });
 }
 }
 if (document.readyState === "loading") {
 document.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded", initFAQ);
 } else {
 initFAQ();
 }
})();
&lt;/script>
&lt;!-- /wp:html -->
&lt;!-- wp:paragraph {"className":"std-text"} -->
&lt;!-- /wp:paragraph -->
&lt;!-- wp:paragraph {"className":"std-text"} -->
&lt;p class="std-text">Global valid routes hit 60.3% as of February 2026, yet &lt;strong>East Asia IPv6&lt;/strong> coverage collapsed by five points. The industry&amp;#039;s rush to secure &lt;strong>Route Origin Validation&lt;/strong> masks a dangerous geopolitical fragmentation where regional progress hides specific, critical failures. While global &lt;strong>ROA coverage&lt;/strong> finally cleared the 50% milestone, relying on aggregate data obscures the reality that substantial economies are actively regressing in routing hygiene.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>